<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
        xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >
<channel>
        <title>Global Private Equity Watch - Feed</title>
        <atom:link href="https://privateequity.weil.com/contributor/sarah-downie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://privateequity.weil.com/contributor/sarah-downie/</link>
        <description></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:03:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language></language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        
                                        <item>
                        <title>Sun Capital Update: First Circuit Rules Affiliated Investment Funds Not Responsible for Portfolio Company’s Pension Liability, Reversing District Court</title>
                        <link>https://privateequity.weil.com/thought-leadership/sun-capital-update-first-circuit-rules-affiliated-investment-funds-not-responsible-for-portfolio-companys-pension-liability-reversing-district-court/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
						                                        <dc:creator>
											Sarah Downie</dc:creator>
                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://privateequity.weil.com/?p=6476</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The most recent decision in the ongoing Sun Capital litigation provides some welcome relief for private equity sponsors invested in portfolio companies subject to pension withdrawal liability. On November 22, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed the 2016 decision of the Federal District Court of Massachusetts that held that two [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com/thought-leadership/sun-capital-update-first-circuit-rules-affiliated-investment-funds-not-responsible-for-portfolio-companys-pension-liability-reversing-district-court/">Sun Capital Update: First Circuit Rules Affiliated Investment Funds Not Responsible for Portfolio Company’s Pension Liability, Reversing District Court</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com">Global Private Equity Watch</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most recent decision in the ongoing Sun Capital litigation provides some welcome relief for private equity sponsors invested in portfolio companies subject to pension withdrawal liability. On November 22, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed the 2016 decision of the Federal District Court of Massachusetts that held that two [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com/thought-leadership/sun-capital-update-first-circuit-rules-affiliated-investment-funds-not-responsible-for-portfolio-companys-pension-liability-reversing-district-court/">Sun Capital Update: First Circuit Rules Affiliated Investment Funds Not Responsible for Portfolio Company’s Pension Liability, Reversing District Court</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com">Global Private Equity Watch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Implications for Portfolio Company Borrowers of Recent Fifth Circuit Decision Vacating DOL Fiduciary Rule</title>
                        <link>https://privateequity.weil.com/features/portfolio-company-borrowers-recent/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
						                                        <dc:creator>
											Sarah Downie</dc:creator>
                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://privateequity.weil.com/?p=2432</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[On March 15, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated certain U.S. Department of Labor “fiduciary investment advice” regulations (“the Regulations”) in their entirety, ruling that the DOL exceeded its authority in promulgating them.]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 15, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated certain U.S. Department of Labor “fiduciary investment advice” regulations (“the Regulations”) in their entirety, ruling that the DOL exceeded its authority in promulgating them.  The Regulations provide that, in general, when a plan or entity subject to ERISA (an “ERISA Plan”) [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com/features/portfolio-company-borrowers-recent/">Implications for Portfolio Company Borrowers of Recent Fifth Circuit Decision Vacating DOL Fiduciary Rule</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com">Global Private Equity Watch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
        </channel>
</rss>