<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
        xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >
<channel>
        <title>Global Private Equity Watch - Feed</title>
        <atom:link href="https://privateequity.weil.com/contributor/frank-adams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://privateequity.weil.com/contributor/frank-adams/</link>
        <description></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:23:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language></language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        
                                        <item>
                        <title>The Perils of Incorporating Statutory and Regulatory Definitions into Indentures and Other Agreements</title>
                        <link>https://privateequity.weil.com/features/the-perils-of-incorporating-statutory-and-regulatory-definitions-into-indentures-and-other-agreements/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
						                                        <dc:creator>
											Frank Adams</dc:creator>
                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://peblog.wpengine.com/?p=1552</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Foresight Energy, LLC, et.  Al., C.A. No. 11059-VCL, memo. Op. (Del. Ch. Dec. 4, 2015) Sophisticated workarounds to avoid tripping indenture provisions are not atypical in mergers or acquisitions where the target (or one of its subsidiaries) has outstanding debt that the parties do not wish to refinance.  However, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com/features/the-perils-of-incorporating-statutory-and-regulatory-definitions-into-indentures-and-other-agreements/">The Perils of Incorporating Statutory and Regulatory Definitions into Indentures and Other Agreements</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com">Global Private Equity Watch</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Foresight Energy, LLC, et.  Al., C.A. No. 11059-VCL, memo. Op. (Del. Ch. Dec. 4, 2015) Sophisticated workarounds to avoid tripping indenture provisions are not atypical in mergers or acquisitions where the target (or one of its subsidiaries) has outstanding debt that the parties do not wish to refinance.  However, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com/features/the-perils-of-incorporating-statutory-and-regulatory-definitions-into-indentures-and-other-agreements/">The Perils of Incorporating Statutory and Regulatory Definitions into Indentures and Other Agreements</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com">Global Private Equity Watch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
        </channel>
</rss>