<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
        xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >
<channel>
        <title>Global Private Equity Watch - Feed</title>
        <atom:link href="https://privateequity.weil.com/category/management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://privateequity.weil.com/category/management/</link>
        <description></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:03:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language></language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        
                                        <item>
                        <title>Weil&#8217;s Q3 2015 Quarterly Private Equity Update: A Comparison of Management Incentive Equity Arrangements in Private Equity Transactions Across the U.S., Europe and Asia</title>
                        <link>https://privateequity.weil.com/asia/a-comparison-of-management-incentive-equity-arrangements-in-private-equity-transactions-across-the-united-states-europe-and-asia/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
						                                        <dc:creator>
											James Harvey</dc:creator>
                                                                                <dc:creator>
											Michael Nissan</dc:creator>
                                                                                <dc:creator>
											Amanda Rotkel (Rosenblum)</dc:creator>
                                                                                <dc:creator>
											Global Private Equity Watch</dc:creator>
                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://peblog.wpengine.com/?p=1325</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Weil’s Global Private Equity Update provides updates on current topics and trends in global private equity. This issue summarizes the approaches taken to management incentive equity arrangements for sponsor-backed transactions in the United States, Europe and Asia. View Weil&#8217;s Q3 2015 Global PE Update.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com/asia/a-comparison-of-management-incentive-equity-arrangements-in-private-equity-transactions-across-the-united-states-europe-and-asia/">Weil&#8217;s Q3 2015 Quarterly Private Equity Update: A Comparison of Management Incentive Equity Arrangements in Private Equity Transactions Across the U.S., Europe and Asia</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com">Global Private Equity Watch</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weil’s Global Private Equity Update provides updates on current topics and trends in global private equity. This issue summarizes the approaches taken to management incentive equity arrangements for sponsor-backed transactions in the United States, Europe and Asia. View Weil&#8217;s Q3 2015 Global PE Update.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com/asia/a-comparison-of-management-incentive-equity-arrangements-in-private-equity-transactions-across-the-united-states-europe-and-asia/">Weil&#8217;s Q3 2015 Quarterly Private Equity Update: A Comparison of Management Incentive Equity Arrangements in Private Equity Transactions Across the U.S., Europe and Asia</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com">Global Private Equity Watch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Writing Indemnification and Advancement Provisions to Protect Former Officers and Directors</title>
                        <link>https://privateequity.weil.com/insights/writing-indemnification-and-advancement-provisions-to-protect-former-officers-and-directors/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 23:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
						                                        <dc:creator>
											Glenn D. West</dc:creator>
                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://peblog.wpengine.com/?p=1061</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[Weil's Private Equity team discusses the difference between an advancement obligation and an indemnification obligation under Delaware corporate law.]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is both a distinction and a definite difference between an advancement obligation and an indemnification obligation under Delaware corporate law.  Indeed, a simple obligation to indemnify an individual does not by itself include any obligation to advance expenses that may ultimately be indemnifiable. And board members want to be covered for one and the other [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com/insights/writing-indemnification-and-advancement-provisions-to-protect-former-officers-and-directors/">Writing Indemnification and Advancement Provisions to Protect Former Officers and Directors</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com">Global Private Equity Watch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Key Takeaways Re: Option Holders Rights from Fox v. CDX Holdings, Inc.</title>
                        <link>https://privateequity.weil.com/insights/key-takeaways-re-option-holders-rights-from-fox-v-cdx-holdings-inc/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
						                                        <dc:creator>
											Glenn D. West</dc:creator>
                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://peblog.wpengine.com/?p=1026</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[Weil's Private Equity team discusses the recent decision in Fox v. CDX Holdings, Inc. and its impact on post-closing indemnification and escrow provisions.]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent decision, by Vice-Chancellor Laster in the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Fox v. CDX Holdings, Inc. is another reminder that, when attempting to bind non-signatories to the post-closing indemnification and escrow provisions of a private company merger agreement, careful compliance not only with the merger statute but also with other relevant contractual rights [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com/insights/key-takeaways-re-option-holders-rights-from-fox-v-cdx-holdings-inc/">Key Takeaways Re: Option Holders Rights from Fox v. CDX Holdings, Inc.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://privateequity.weil.com">Global Private Equity Watch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
        </channel>
</rss>